I prefer the simple understated approach to watch design; not too large, an easy-to-read dial and plain strap or bracelet. However, some real horrors are available, which are generally characterised by being illegible, too busy and brightly-coloured. I call these (rather rudely, I know) footballers' watches.
Men of taste generally prefer something more discreet, a timepiece that whispers subtly about the wearer's character. This man is a rugged explorer when not at his accountant's desk, this man sails ocean-going yachts when not dog-walking, this man dives in the Maldives when not timing the cooking of his eggs, this man uses his watch to time space rocket engine burns when not checking how late the train is.
Such watches have plain-designed black or white dials, the numerals and hands can be seen clearly and they're not much larger than 42 mm in diameter. The sort of watch that James Bond would wear in fact (I mean the real book-Bond, not the film characters).
![]() |
Rolex Explorer (1970s) |
I've written about a few of my favourites in previous posts (listed below), the older models of Rolex Explorer 1, GMT Master and Submariner all fit the bill. Newer Rolex models are getting larger and fussier, so vintage can be the way to go and older Rolex models are excellent investments.
![]() |
Rolex Submariner |
The Omega Speedmaster Professional is an obvious buy for the budding astronaut (used by Apollo astronauts on the Moon and up the present day on the Space Shuttle and ISS).
![]() |
Vintage Omega Speedmaster Pro, as worn on the Moon |
Vintage military watches have many of the characteristics I've outlined; they have to be rugged and easily legible - and not so large they get in the way.
![]() |
Omega '53, vintage RAF watch |
Links to other posts about watches (and search the labels to the right of this page) -
Rolex Explorer - the original Bond watch?
Rolex GMT Master - for the travelling man.
Collectible wristwatches - CWC SBS diver.
These are the watches that I've come to appreciate on my personal search for style. You, no doubt, will have other preferences. Please comment below -
Bulova Accutron model 214 Spaceview - that's the one with the tuning fork and no stem (it sets from the back). Elegant, classic design. Made 1960 to 76 or so. Available at reasonable prices for a recently serviced and properly running example.
ReplyDeleteThe 70's Explorer is a fine watch, as are most of the others. NATO straps on the other hand are utterly naff. What's wrong with a bracelet or leather strap?
ReplyDeleteI go for a plain gold Rotary. Agree with all your comments on this one.
ReplyDeleteVintage watches seem to be popping up in lots of jewellers now , for both men & women . My OH is very interested in them but his taste is rather eclectic . His beloved Jaeger le Coutre reverso is alternated with a local market cheapo (£5) for gardening . I have to say , the cheapo keeps slightly better time .....wendy
ReplyDeleteI was a diver and underwater photographer for 28 years, when I started diving in the 1970s, I would have loved a Rolex Submariner which at that time cost about £650. Nowadays, its almost £3000. I never did get one. Having said that I would never have used it whilst diving, they're too easy to lose on a dive.
ReplyDeleteI used a Sekio automatic dive watch for timing my dives, it came with a rubber strap which I removed because it use to cause a skin irritation. I replaced it with a Nato strap which served the purpose well but they need an ocassional wash cos they do tend to niff after a while.
I agree, an easy to read dial is a must, the dial of that first watch would be a nightmare to read especially if suffering from the narks.
Of course as time progressed, I resorted to an all singing and dancing dive computor and the watch was left in the boat.
Regards
David
Thank you for all the constructive comment and suggestions, it's much appreciated.
ReplyDeleteGF.
Great site Greyfox - found my way here from TZ-UK...
ReplyDeleteWhilst I love the look of the original Explorer, having tried one it really felt too small for my personal taste, (and I'm not into BIG watches, Panerai etc)... After many enjoyable try-outs, (with a few keepers and flips along the way) I finally, ignored the many detractors and took the plunge on the new Explorer 214270 - and haven't worn much else since!
Stylish without shouting, versatile and understated quality - seems to fit most of your criteria?
Rob
1970's Rolex Explorer is the best choice in this list of watches you shared..
ReplyDeleteRolex New york
I Agree with you Jane, Rolex Explorer is is really stunning one..
ReplyDeleteladies diamond watches